| My Prized Objects |
|
Thursday, January 3, 2008
My most useful and functionally important possession is my cell phone. From early morning till late afternoon I can not be reached through my house phone. Therefore, my cell phone is the only thing that keeps me in contact with my friends, family, and my colleagues from work. Besides its connecting function it also serves as a notebook and a calendar which maintains my schedule as close to my plans as possible. It reminds me of important meetings and events, allows excess to the internet through which I can check my mail and even messages on my home phone if I am away for a long time. In one word my cell phone is a lot of things to me built-in a small black carcass. If I desperately needed money I would sell it. Most people would agree that a watch is a very functional thing as well. To me, though, it does not serve as a mere time showing device. First of all it is memory of my eighteenth birthday. It’s not a matter of an expensive watch that I truly like, it is rather the sense of my family being close to me. It is the remembrance of the good times spent in my family house, my carefree childhood and my parents always there for me. Being away from home is not always easy and family ties are very important to me. This watch is some sort of a medium keeping my thoughts positively bound with those times and warm relationships with my loved ones. This way of thinking helps me to get through harsh times in my life with less pain and stress. My watch brings all the good feelings I need to experience to feel loved and remembered, to feel happy. Another thing that makes my time meaningful and memorable is my camera. It is my major hobby that gets almost all of my free time. It has been nearly three years ago when I got my Nikon F65, half-professional camera that makes high quality pictures. At that time it was just something to do; now it is a way to express myself, cultivate and expend my creativity. My camera is often my best friend as it understands me without a word spoken and reflects my moods and desires perfectly on the film. All of the important events and things I want to remember are never forgotten, and are saved in my photo albums and picture frames. The walls at my place bear all of the memorable moments of my life, the happiest moments that I always want to remember. Those good things are much better seen through the camera lenses, it catches all the best that this world has to offer, it proves that life is beautiful. All of the objects described previously are very material and can be easily bought in almost any store. The thought of ever selling them never crossed my mind, only if I go completely broke it would improve my financial condition, otherwise I cannot imagine my life without them. They complete my existence and make it meaningful. They add up to my personality and help me to understand my priorities and interests in life. Many people get used to some material things and would not even consider giving them up even if they got something better instead. Most of those people can not clearly explain their zeal for these things. Luckily, I am not one of those people. I have discovered what those important things are and what they mean to me. They mean that I have found my own way to be happy and discovered joy in simple things. Jeff Stats is a writer at essay writing service Mindrelief.net. Order quality custom essays William Carlos William's Spring and All The poem begins in a very straight forward set of words that cause the reader numerous impressions of the landscape being described. It starts with the words "contagious hospital" and it is obvious from the language the author uses that the hospital is not contagious because of the disease, but rather it itself is a sickness, an ever-present state in this depressing landscape. The whole poem could be seen as Williams's response to the wasteland world of poverty and disease which he encountered a lot as a doctor. Williams's interpretation of this wilderness of clouds, cold, mud, and dead plants gives it a stark beauty, however. Surprisingly while reading this poem one understands that the author, although writes in a very harsh way, he is secretly in love with what he sees around. The "purplish, forked, upstanding, twiggy / stuff of bushes and small trees" stands not as thematic background but as something worth examining in itself, as part of nature. The theme of spring just awakening together with all of the natural demonstration of its appearance in the nearest future, is traced throughout the entire poem. Even the poem’s structure hints that spring is a rushing season when everything changes and becomes something different very quickly. This opinion can be proved by the poem’s lineation, for instance: "under the surge of the blue / mottled clouds driven from the / northeast", "blue" and "mottled" are separated by the line break, yet they are semantically combined. The eye jumps from what is normally an adjective, "blue," to the next line to find the noun, "clouds," although the line break suggests that "the blue" is itself one unit. The lineation creates the effect of a windy spring sky, the "blue mottled clouds" changing so fast that the reader must pay close attention to distinguish "blue" from "clouds." As was mentioned before this genre of writing causes the reader to imagine very vividly what the author is picturing for us, and also provides a better comprehension of the author’s own feeling and thoughts at the time. Williams just like a doctor examining a patient, is writing about the landscape being naked and fully exposed. He is trying to find out the symptoms of the possible disease, this time though, it’s the spring that is coming. The landscape is being renewed with the new life following the approach of "sluggish dazed spring," it evokes the shoots growing from the earth, but the language leaves the referent of "they" unsure and undecided. Those words suggest a more general concept of birth, physical rebirth that is spiritual in the sense of absolute faith in rebirth. "uncertain of all / save that they enter." The wind is "familiar," not shocking, to the newborn simply because there are no preconceptions in plant life, as well as with the human child coming to this world, because he does not have an understanding of all things and cannot compare. The late winter wasteland will give birth to spring whether we interpret it or not; the child will struggle to survive whether hi family care for him or not. I think this is the general direction of the poem and its gloomy mood. William’s physician's vision of examining the world empirically, rather than symbolically: "One by one, objects are defined— / It quickens: clarity, outline of leaf" These lines symbolize Williams’s rejection of simple symbolism in and thinks that the world must be viewed as it is and not to be attached to the symbols made up by someone. The author constantly discovers things throughout the poem, just like the doctor with a patient "Still, the profound change has come upon them: rooted they grip down and begin to awaken". He realizes that the movement of life never stops and that the new born have to grip to what they see in order to defend themselves and struggle to survive. He has no romantic thoughts about realities of life and views spring more as a physical act of nature. From the decay of winter arises the rebirth of spring growth; from the poor city blocks arises will to live better and to survive. Although death and decay are ever-present, the promise of new life (the spring) and rebirth never vanishes. His spleen and excitement and spring is seen in this poem at the same time and exactly this strange mixture of feeling tell us that spring is not the easiest things to understand and to accept for Williams. However, he marvels at the new life being brought to the world and probably this fact makes death easier to bear. Jeff Stats is a writer at essay writing service Mindrelief.net. Order quality custom essays Why is it so Hard to Talk For Men and Women? The essay addresses all men and women having problems in conversing with each other. The purpose of the paper is to show that most problems occur in the families when couples come to understand that their conversational habits are very different. It analyzes how those patterns differ, how each partner interprets the behavior of the other and how these problems could be solved if each side realizes the problem. The author of the article claims that women in marriage much more often than man focus on intangible assets as the major problems. This claim is also supported by the research of Andrew Hacker which conducted his study way back in the 70’s and the authors own research proved the problem to be still existent to this day. For women she says it is lack of communication, as wives want their husband to be their conversational partners. On the other hand husbands view this situation as unimportant, that is where the initial problem develops from. The essay provides a lot of support material to prove author’s point of view. It includes the research conducted by Eleanor Maccoby, who was studying the behavior of the children while they are interacting in the same sex groups. It showed that boys and girls have totally different values and norms from young age which would continue to be true when they grow up. This research helps the author in comparing her own research on men’s and women’s conversational patters. The ideas of her colleague proved by the scientific data leads her to the conclusion that the for girls and for boys just like for men and women conversations mean different things in life. These researches being a factual evidence combines with an expert opinion, together gives us a quite strong persuasive tone of the paper. Another aspect of men and women communication introduced in the essay is that of a different perception of each gender of the talking. So girls view talking as something comforting and being a cornerstone of the friendship as author indicates. On the other hand boy and man, view communication as a defensive procedure; their groups are larger then girls’ and more hierarchical, that is why they have to prove to be on top of the group rather than being “one-down” when they have to listen. For boys it’s more of a self-actualization need when they talk in the group, to show the other their ability. For women, however, it is a psychological and belongingness need, which leads to great uncomforting when not satisfied. A strong point that gives prove to the correctness of the argument of this paper is the description of body language particularities for each of the sexes. The research by psychologist Bruce Dorval of children and adults communicating in same sex groups show that men’s and women’s gestures and behavior differs greatly. So females looked straight as each other, which meant for them attentive listening, and for males looking elsewhere and sometimes glaring at each other meant the same. Thus, again the author proves that these differences begin in the childhood and continue on in the adult life. The physical alignment as the author puts it and defines as different body language while talking or listening become one of the strongest barriers in cross-gender communication. Switching topics frequently and reacting to someone else’s problems is yet another point made by the author to show that men are poles apart from women on this subject. Interviews of the boys of different ages have indicated that they dismiss each other’s problems, while girls consider such reactions as unsupportive. While men are switching topics, women make a lot of noises when communicating so as to show their attention and support. Men do not do that and consider it a disturbance and inattention. Again this arouses misunderstanding between them, and again proves the debated author’s point of view. To give the dispute a finishing evident support the author provides a standpoint of men being agonistic and "warlike" when any conversation becomes a debate, while women wait for support and understanding. She proves if by the book "Fighting for Life," by Walter Ong. The essay includes a multilayered support evidence of the author’s arguable point. She is proving that men and women communication patterns are different in many points and she does provide those points. Her supporting points are appropriate to the paper subject, as she holds a continuous defense of her theory. She proves if by her own researches and by other people’s as well, actually professionals in the field of study. Those researches are also taken from different time periods and different perspectives to show that her discussed topic was and remains significant not only to her but to the American society as a whole, which undergoes a troubling problem of high rate of divorces. This paper has strong and convincing interpretation, first of all because the author views the problem from different sides and tries to explain where the initial problem came from. She gives support to her claims from different sources (male and female authors) and provides unbiased research materials conducted by her. This systematic approach to the question discussed shows the origins of the problem, the contents of it (the reactions, the behaviors, the perceptions of the sides) and conclusions of the author. Her support can be considered effective because the sustainable support leads the reader himself/herself to the conclusion the author want us to see. She takes a lot of examples from life and makes it easier and more convincing for the reader to relate the discussed topic with real life. Fro young people this article is interesting because it provides valuable information about gender differences and could help to avoid or solve many problems. For older audience, such as already married couple it also could be a saving pill, because it does offer a solution in the end. The example of a couple, when a guy listened to girl’s talks in a very particular and unusual way, is a vivid illustration of drastic differences in life perception of both genders. Although the problem existed, the couple solved it by getting to know that it exists in the first place and why they think differently of it. When that was decided, they found a saving compromise which was painless to both of them. That short story actually explains the whole complexity of the problem the author is trying to tell us. Personally for me, this essay was a very convincing and informative one. All the evidence provided in it served to prove author’s point of view, and I think she did prove it with great success. The argument was step-by-step discussed and supported by various real life examples and simple to understand, for a non-professional, definitions. All of that made if possible for the paper to be easily read and perceived without me reading it more that two times. The simplicity of the used language and presented logical supportive facts composed the essay’s body, which in turn led to a logical conclusion. This paper was not only correctly written in the sense of scientific approach to the matter discussed, but also linguistically and grammatically appropriate style helped to comprehend what the author was addressing. It provides the thesis statement in the beginning, supportive evidence in the body and an appropriate conclusion which naturally comes from the discussion. I believe this fact to be the strongest aspect of the essay. I think that this essay is an encouraging piece of work that combined accommodating facts to show that such a problem as communication gap between genders exist. Its logical text structure as was already mentioned reaches the audience, gets its attention and accomplishes author’s goal of getting the readers to think about the problem. The essay addresses all men and women having problems in conversing with each other. The purpose of the paper is to show that most problems occur in the families when couples come to understand that their conversational habits are very different. It analyzes how those patterns differ, how each partner interprets the behavior of the other and how these problems could be solved if each side realizes the problem. The author of the article claims that women in marriage much more often than man focus on intangible assets as the major problems. This claim is also supported by the research of Andrew Hacker which conducted his study way back in the 70’s and the authors own research proved the problem to be still existent to this day. For women she says it is lack of communication, as wives want their husband to be their conversational partners. On the other hand husbands view this situation as unimportant, that is where the initial problem develops from. The essay provides a lot of support material to prove author’s point of view. It includes the research conducted by Eleanor Maccoby, who was studying the behavior of the children while they are interacting in the same sex groups. It showed that boys and girls have totally different values and norms from young age which would continue to be true when they grow up. This research helps the author in comparing her own research on men’s and women’s conversational patters. The ideas of her colleague proved by the scientific data leads her to the conclusion that the for girls and for boys just like for men and women conversations mean different things in life. These researches being a factual evidence combines with an expert opinion, together gives us a quite strong persuasive tone of the paper. Another aspect of men and women communication introduced in the essay is that of a different perception of each gender of the talking. So girls view talking as something comforting and being a cornerstone of the friendship as author indicates. On the other hand boy and man, view communication as a defensive procedure; their groups are larger then girls’ and more hierarchical, that is why they have to prove to be on top of the group rather than being “one-down” when they have to listen. For boys it’s more of a self-actualization need when they talk in the group, to show the other their ability. For women, however, it is a psychological and belongingness need, which leads to great uncomforting when not satisfied. A strong point that gives prove to the correctness of the argument of this paper is the description of body language particularities for each of the sexes. The research by psychologist Bruce Dorval of children and adults communicating in same sex groups show that men’s and women’s gestures and behavior differs greatly. So females looked straight as each other, which meant for them attentive listening, and for males looking elsewhere and sometimes glaring at each other meant the same. Thus, again the author proves that these differences begin in the childhood and continue on in the adult life. The physical alignment as the author puts it and defines as different body language while talking or listening become one of the strongest barriers in cross-gender communication. Switching topics frequently and reacting to someone else’s problems is yet another point made by the author to show that men are poles apart from women on this subject. Interviews of the boys of different ages have indicated that they dismiss each other’s problems, while girls consider such reactions as unsupportive. While men are switching topics, women make a lot of noises when communicating so as to show their attention and support. Men do not do that and consider it a disturbance and inattention. Again this arouses misunderstanding between them, and again proves the debated author’s point of view. To give the dispute a finishing evident support the author provides a standpoint of men being agonistic and "warlike" when any conversation becomes a debate, while women wait for support and understanding. She proves if by the book "Fighting for Life," by Walter Ong. The essay includes a multilayered support evidence of the author’s arguable point. She is proving that men and women communication patterns are different in many points and she does provide those points. Her supporting points are appropriate to the paper subject, as she holds a continuous defense of her theory. She proves if by her own researches and by other people’s as well, actually professionals in the field of study. Those researches are also taken from different time periods and different perspectives to show that her discussed topic was and remains significant not only to her but to the American society as a whole, which undergoes a troubling problem of high rate of divorces. This paper has strong and convincing interpretation, first of all because the author views the problem from different sides and tries to explain where the initial problem came from. She gives support to her claims from different sources (male and female authors) and provides unbiased research materials conducted by her. This systematic approach to the question discussed shows the origins of the problem, the contents of it (the reactions, the behaviors, the perceptions of the sides) and conclusions of the author. Her support can be considered effective because the sustainable support leads the reader himself/herself to the conclusion the author want us to see. She takes a lot of examples from life and makes it easier and more convincing for the reader to relate the discussed topic with real life. Fro young people this article is interesting because it provides valuable information about gender differences and could help to avoid or solve many problems. For older audience, such as already married couple it also could be a saving pill, because it does offer a solution in the end. The example of a couple, when a guy listened to girl’s talks in a very particular and unusual way, is a vivid illustration of drastic differences in life perception of both genders. Although the problem existed, the couple solved it by getting to know that it exists in the first place and why they think differently of it. When that was decided, they found a saving compromise which was painless to both of them. That short story actually explains the whole complexity of the problem the author is trying to tell us. Personally for me, this essay was a very convincing and informative one. All the evidence provided in it served to prove author’s point of view, and I think she did prove it with great success. The argument was step-by-step discussed and supported by various real life examples and simple to understand, for a non-professional, definitions. All of that made if possible for the paper to be easily read and perceived without me reading it more that two times. The simplicity of the used language and presented logical supportive facts composed the essay’s body, which in turn led to a logical conclusion. This paper was not only correctly written in the sense of scientific approach to the matter discussed, but also linguistically and grammatically appropriate style helped to comprehend what the author was addressing. It provides the thesis statement in the beginning, supportive evidence in the body and an appropriate conclusion which naturally comes from the discussion. I believe this fact to be the strongest aspect of the essay. I think that this essay is an encouraging piece of work that combined accommodating facts to show that such a problem as communication gap between genders exist. Its logical text structure as was already mentioned reaches the audience, gets its attention and accomplishes author’s goal of getting the readers to think about the problem. |
|
||||
ukryj reklamę